Walden University Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews NURS 6052 – Step-By-Step Guide

This Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews NURS 6052 task requires you to lay the foundation for how you will succeed professionally and academically. You are required to align your vision with Walden University’s mission and vision. These steps will help you find it easy to succeed as a student in the institution and during your later years as a healthcare practitioner. Another objective will be to review the vision and mission statements of the university and the course’s learning outcomes. In doing so, you will understand how the university’s principles align with your values. 

Understanding how the university supports academic success and social change can further help your development. It also requires you to identify professional and academic teams and individuals that will be essential in supporting your journey toward academic and professional development. The discussion also requires that you introduce yourself to other colleagues, explaining how your personal goals align with the vision and the missions of the university.

How to Research and Prepare for Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews NURS 6052

The initial stage in researching Walden University Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews NURS 6052 will be the review of Walden University and the College of Nursing resources, which includes the visions and the missions of the institution. You can access these resources from the university’s website and other academic resources provided in the learning modules. The resources will be essential in guiding you on aligning your values with them and making any necessary changes to bring about a positive change. 

Subsequently, you will review the learning outcomes that articulate the competencies and skills that you will be required to develop by the end of the course. Going through the course outcomes will help you pinpoint areas where your professional and academic goals align with the course objectives, ensuring you gain the necessary skills and competencies to achieve personal and professional aspirations.

Additionally, you will develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest for the Assignment. To do this, make use of the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question.

Another step will be to identify the potential teams and individuals you can collaborate with to progress. You will rely on various strategies to identify them, such as analyzing the profiles of the relevant faculty advisors who can mentor youth throughout the program. You can also seek the help of student support services such as career advisors to connect you with other peers. You can also join online communities and professional nursing organizations to expand their professional network.

You will look for articles and resources on your selected PICOT Questions to guide you on the best strategies for forming and maintaining professional relationships, as well as how to use platforms like LinkedIn to look for job prospects and get opportunities to attend professional seminars and conferences. The last step after the research will be to synthesize the information to be used in writing the discussion post. By following the research approach designed above, you will see that your discussion post is comprehensive and evidence-based and considers your personal goals and the help from the university and the faculty.

How to Write the Introduction for Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews NURS 6052

The introduction will include a summary of myself, your professional background and academic aspirations. You will also explore how the university’s mission, vision and goals align with your academic and professional objectives. You will explain how the institution’s commitment to academic success and social change can help you become an effective healthcare worker in the future. They can also expound on how the learning outcomes will be crucial to meeting their goals. They will also highlight how networking will be crucial in helping them get opportunities to interact with other people and attend professional seminars and conferences.

How to Write the body for Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews NURS 6052

Writing the body for NURS 6052 Week 1 Discussion Nursing Research and EBP Assignment will involve several paragraphs, each with a main point and supporting evidence. You will highlight the importance of PICOT Question development in helping a nurse like you to access multiple opportunities in the healthcare field. You will be straight to the point, ensuring your points are understood. You will also ensure that you end with a conclusion sentence to summarize the content of each paragraph to promote comprehension.

How to Write the In-text citations for Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews NURS 6052

In-text citations are a way for the writer to give credit to the authors for the resources they have used to write a paper. They involve informing the reader of the content about the author from which the ideas used have been borrowed. This involves mentioning the author and the date that the original resource was published, which is usually included in parentheses. The writer can choose to directly quote the author or summarize the content in their own words. In-text citations are a way for writers to inform the readers that the content is not their own words but that they have borrowed the insights from someone else.

APA requires that one include the author’s last name and the date of publication in parenthesis when citing at the beginning of a sentence, for example, as in “Author (2012) concludes that a person is innocent until proven guilty.” One can also include the author and the date in parenthesis when the statement is given first before crediting the author, as in “A person is innocent until proven guilty (Author, 2012).” When more than two writers are involved, the statement “et al.” is used to show that there are other writers who are referred to, like in “A person is innocent until proven guilty (Author et al., 2012).”

How to format the reference list for Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews NURS 6052

The reference list must always start on a new page with the title “References,” which should be in title case, bolded, and centered. The references should be sorted in ascending order. Each entry should start with the list of authors, the title of the journal or book, the date of publication, and the name of the journal. If a journal is referenced, the title should be in a title case, and each letter of the name of the journal should be capitalized. If a website is referenced, the date of access to the resource should be given with an active hyperlink to the resource. In the case of a journal, the hyperlink to the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) should be provided.

References

Walden University. (n.d. a). College of Nursing. Retrieved June 3, 2020, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/fieldexperience/son#s-lg-box-3837398

Walden University. (n.d. b). Writing Center. Retrieved June 3, 2020, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter 

Advanced Levels Of Clinical Inquiry And Systematic Reviews NURS 6052

Week 5 Assignment Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels Of Clinical Inquiry And Systematic Reviews

Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?

In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.

To Prepare

Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest for the Assignment. Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question.

Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project) Part 3:

  • Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
  • Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
  • Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.
  • Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

References

  • Davies, K. S. (2011). Formulating the Evidence Based Practice Question: A Review of the Frameworks. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 6(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8WS5N
  • Melnyk, B.M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare. A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
  • Schears, G. J., Ferko, N., Syed, I., Arpino, J.-M., & Alsbrooks, K. (2021). 

Peripherally inserted central catheters inserted with current best practices have low deep vein thrombosis and central line-associated bloodstream infection risk compared with centrally inserted central catheters: A contemporary meta-analysis. The Journal of

Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews NURS 6052 EBP Part 3 Example 

Description of clinical issue of interest

In middle-aged men with type 2 diabetes and normal blood pressure, does blood pressure lowering medication prevent the risks of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases?

There is a significant correlation between blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases among patients with Diabetes.

Taking blood pressure medication can prevent pressure related heart issues among these patients (Rahman et al., 2019)

How the PICOT question was developed

The PICOT was developed from the statement: benefits of the anti-arterial hypertension therapy for diabetes

The search terms were: impact of blood pressure medication on diabetes related heart disease; diabetes and heart disease;

How the PICOT question was developed Cont.

The PICOT question was developed based on the suggestions from numerous databases.

The Issue was divided into sections as follows:

P (Problem): In middle-aged men with type 2 diabetes and normal blood pressure

I (Intervention): does blood pressure-lowering medication

C (Comparison): to no medication

O (Outcome): prevent the risks of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases

T (Time):

Research databases used to conduct the search

MEDLINE

EBSCOhost

CINAHL

PubMed

Levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected

Emdin et al. (2015) is a randomized controlled trial that included 100354 participants

McLean et al. (2016) is a systematic review research that involved 77649 participants, with 47964 of them being diabetic

Rahman et al. (2019) is a systematic review involving 1048 participants

Vargas-Uricoechea & Cáceres-Acosta (2018) is a randomized control research that was conducted on 15000 participants

Strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research

The systematic review’s strengths include: the question’s specificity, the thorough search for evidence, the criteria-based selection of pertinent evidence, the rigorous assessment of validity, the objective or quantitative summary, and the inferences drawn from the evidence.

References

Emdin, C. A., Rahimi, K., Neal, B., Callender, T., Perkovic, V., & Patel, A. (2015). Blood pressure lowering in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama, 313(6), 603-615. Emdin, C. A., Rahimi, K., Neal, B., Callender, T., Perkovic, V., & Patel, A. (2015). Blood pressure lowering in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama, 313(6), 603-615. 

McLean, D. L., Simpson, S. H., McAlister, F. A., & Tsuyuki, R. T. (2016). Treatment and blood pressure control in 47,964 people with diabetes and hypertension: a systematic review of observational studies. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 22(10), 855-860. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70304-x

Nazarzadeh, M., Bidel, Z., Canoy, D., Copland, E., Wamil, M., Majert, J., & Trialists’Collaboration, B. P. L. T. (2021). Blood pressure lowering and risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta-analysis. The Lancet, 398(10313), 1803-1810.

Rahman, F., McEvoy, J. W., Ohkuma, T., Marre, M., Hamet, P., Harrap, S., & ADVANCE Collaborative Group. (2019). Effects of blood pressure lowering on clinical outcomes according to baseline blood pressure and cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the ADVANCE trial. Hypertension, 73(6), 1291-1299. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12414

Vargas-Uricoechea, H., & Cáceres-Acosta, M. F. (2018). Control of blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Open Medicine, 13(1), 304-323. doi: 10.1515/med-2018-0048

Part 4: Critical Appraisal Of Research

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals conducted using appraisal tools to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use appraisal tools to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and consider the importance of critically appraising research evidence.
  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.
  • Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tools document provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tools document. Be sure to include:

  • An evaluation table
  • A levels of evidence table
  • An outcomes synthesis table
Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

Part 5: Recommending An Evidence-Based Practice Change

The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.

In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an

EBP approach.

To Prepare:

Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4. Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change.

The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project) Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change

Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)

Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general. Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.

  • Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
  • Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
  • Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
  • Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
  • A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
  • An explanation about what you learned from completing the evaluation table (1 slide) An explanation about what you learned from completing the levels of evidence table (1 slide)
  • An explanation about what you learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table (1 slide)

Part 6: Disseminating Results

The dissemination of EBP results serves multiple important roles. Sharing results makes the case for your decisions. It also adds to the body of knowledge, which creates opportunities for future practitioners. By presenting results, you also become an advocate for EBP, creating a culture within your organization or beyond that informs, educates, and promotes the effective use of EBP.

To Prepare:

  • Review the final PowerPoint presentation you submitted in Module 5, and make any necessary changes based on the feedback you have received and on lessons you have learned throughout the course.
  • Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.

To Complete:

  • Create a 5-minute, 5- to 6-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your

Evidence-Based Project.

  • Be sure to incorporate any feedback or changes from your presentation submission in Module 5.
  • Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.

Also Read: 

Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews NURS 6052

NURS 6052 Assignment Essay Papers

NURS 6052 Week 8 Discussion: Planning for Data Collection Assignment

NURS 6052 Week 5 Discussion Qualitative Research Designs

Frequently Asked Questions

When approaching a 500-word essay, it’s essential to understand the nuances of this compact form of writing. These frequently asked questions will guide you through the process of crafting a concise and impactful essay.

How many pages is a 500-word essay typically?

A 500-word essay usually spans about one page if single-spaced or two pages when double-spaced, with standard margins and a 12-point font size.

Can you provide examples of a well-structured 500-word essay?

Certainly, to see the structure and flow of a well-written essay, you might want to take a look at a student’s writing guide that provides insights and examples.

Are there specific formatting guidelines for a 500-word essay?

Formatting guidelines typically involve using a legible font like Times New Roman or Arial, size 12, with double-spacing and one-inch margins on all sides. Check any specific requirements your instructor might have provided.

What are some effective strategies for writing a personal essay of 500 words?

For a personal essay, focus on a singular event or characteristic, ensuring your ideas are clear and you reflect on the significance of the subject matter. Use concise language and powerful imagery to maximize impact.

What topics are suitable for a concise 500-word essay?

Choose topics you can thoroughly address within the word limit, such as a personal anecdote, a critical analysis of a poem, or a focused argument on a singular point or issue.

How much time should you allocate to write a 500-word essay effectively?

Depending on your familiarity with the topic and writing proficiency, allocate anywhere from one to several hours for planning, drafting, and revising to ensure a well-presented essay.