Nursing Assignment Acers

Discussion: The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle

Discussion: The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle

Discussion: The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle

In the media introduction to this module, it was suggested that you as a nurse have an important role in the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC). With a focus on patient care and outcomes, nurses may not always see themselves as contributors to the development of new systems. However, as you may have observed in your own experience, exclusion of nurse contributions when implementing systems can have dire consequences.

In this Discussion, you will consider the role you might play in systems development and the ramifications of not being an active participant in systems development.

To Prepare:

  • Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) as presented in the Resources.
  • Reflect on your own healthcare organization and consider any steps your healthcare organization goes through when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system.
  • Consider what a nurse might contribute to decisions made at each stage of the SDLC when planning for new health information technology.

By Day 3 of Week 9

Post a description of what you believe to be the consequences of a healthcare organization not involving nurses in each stage of the SDLC when purchasing and implementing a new health information technology system. Provide specific examples of potential issues at each stage of the SDLC and explain how the inclusion of nurses may help address these issues. Then, explain whether you had any input in the selection and planning of new health information technology systems in your nursing practice or healthcare organization and explain potential impacts of being included or not in the decision-making process. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 9

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, by offering additional thoughts regarding the examples shared, SDLC-related issues, and ideas on how the inclusion of nurses might have impacted the example described by your colleagues.

References

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 9, “Systems Development Life Cycle: Nursing Informatics and Organizational Decision Making” (pp. 175–187)
  • Chapter 12, “Electronic Security” (pp. 229–242)
  • Chapter 13, “Workflow and Beyond Meaningful Use” (pp. 245–261) Health Information Technology

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 9 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 9

To participate in this Discussion:

Module 5

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Sample Paper

What are the fundamental steps in problem-solving for creating new information systems? Define the typical systems lifecycle and discuss its benefits and drawbacks for the development of systems. Discussion: The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle

There are four core problem-solving steps for developing new information systems. Today I will discuss each of them in detail below.

First, define and understand the problem. This is a fundamental step to solve a complex problem. We need to have a comprehensive and deep understanding of the new information systems before we initiate the development process.

Second, develop alternative solutions. There is always more than one way to develop new information systems. If one way is too complicated and too risky, just try another one.

Third, evaluate and choose a solution. When we choose solutions, we will need to make sure the problems we have can be solved by this solution. We also need to know how well this solution can solve our problem and what other costs might be. Always make sure to evaluate before implementing.

Fourth, implement solution. The last step is implementation. We will need to make sure all other steps are finished before implementation. And segregation of duties should be imposed when it comes to implementing sensitive projects.

The traditional systems lifecycle includes planning, creating, testing, and deploying an information system. One of the most apparent advantages of this lifecycle is that it covers all major aspects of systems building. The downside is this traditional way might not be flexible to adapt to a great variety of situations in this fast-changing world.

Reference:

Sahil Barjtya, Ankur Sharma, Usha Rani (2017). A detailed study of Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Models. International Journal Of Engineering And Computer Science ISSN:2319-7242Volume 6 Issue 7 July 2017, Page No. 22097-22100

reply#2

There are four steps to building an information system(The first three steps are called systems analysis):

  • Define and understand the problem.

At the beginning of solving the problem for the new information system is to find out and understand it. You must understand it in detail before dealing with problems. So, people can find the best way and solve the problem quickly and perfectly.

  • Develop alternative solutions.

There are several ways that people can solve the problems. After understanding the core issue, employees need to brainstorm and develop alternative solutions. A variety of solutions can ensure that these problems are completed with the least loss.

  • Choose a solution.

The group needs to evaluate before choosing the solution. Members must know which alternative solution is better for the new system. The choice must be determined. Every time the plan is changed is an additional cost. In addition, these errors will also delay the use of the system. This would be another intangible expense.

  • Implement the solution.

This is the last step of core problem-solving steps for developing new information systems. People need to prepare everything before doing this step.

Traditional systems lifecycle called Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). It also called Waterfall Model. It fits when the requirements of a project are stable, accurately defined, and can tolerate a long development cycle. The advantage of SDLC is good for monitor large projects, standardized design and development, and easy to maintain. The advantage is Increased development time, increased development cost. It also difficult to estimate cost.

Reference

Traditional system life cycle. (2014, April 6). Retrieved from

https://www.management4all.org/2014/04/traditional…

Rubric

  Excellent Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

. 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

mersin escmersin esc