Review “The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity,” and explore the “Campaign for Action: State Action Coalition” website, both located in the topic Resources. In a 1,000-1,250-word paper, discuss the influence “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health” and state-based action coalitions have had on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing workforce development, and how they continue to advance the goals for the nursing profession. NRS 440 Future of Nursing Report
Include the following:
Describe the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the report, “The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity.”
Explain the trend occurring in the nursing workforce and how nursing education is adapting to meet the evolving needs of the profession. What is the role of the nurse in leading change?
Discuss the role of state-based action coalitions. Explain how these coalitions help advance the goals specified in the National Academy of Sciences report, “The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity.”
Research the initiatives on which your state’s action coalition is working. Summarize two initiatives spearheaded by your state’s action coalition. Discuss the ways these initiatives advance the nursing profession.
Describe barriers to advancement that currently exist in your state and explain how nursing advocates in your state overcome these barriers.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice. NRS 440 Future of Nursing Report
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the https://wdc.in/banking/upi-online-casinos/ Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Beat the deadline
Order today and get your high-quality custom paper within hours.
This NRS 440 Future of Nursing Report assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this NRS 440 Future of Nursing Report assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Resources
Trends in Health Care: A Nursing Perspective
Read Chapter 1 in Trends in Health Care: A Nursing Perspective.
2. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity
Read Chapters 1, 3, 7, and 9 in The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity.
3. Fact Sheet: The Impact of Education on Nursing PracticeRead “Fact Sheet: The Impact of Education on Nursing Practice,” located on the American Association of Colleges of Nursing website.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and Future of Nursing Report
Criteria Description
A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report. NRS 440 Future of Nursing Report
5. Target
16.5 points
A clear and accurate description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is presented.
4. Acceptable
14.69 points
A detailed description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is presented.
3. Approaching
13.04 points
A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is presented.
2. Insufficient
12.38 points
A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report lacks detail or is incomplete. NRS 440 Future of Nursing Report
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the work of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that led to the Future of Nursing report is omitted or inaccurate.
Current Trends and Education
Criteria Description
An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce and how nursing education is adapting to meet the needs.
5. Target
16.5 points
A clear and accurate explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change of the profession is discussed.
4. Acceptable
14.69 points
A detailed explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change is discussed.
3. Approaching
13.04 points
An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change is discussed. NRS 440 Future of Nursing Report
2. Insufficient
12.38 points
An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of current trends in the nursing workforce, how nursing education is adapting to meet the needs, and the role of the nurse in leading change is omitted or inaccurate.
State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form National Academy of Sciences re
Criteria Description
A discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report.
5. Target
16.5 points
A clear and accurate discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report is presented.
4. Acceptable
14.69 points
A detailed discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report is presented.
3. Approaching
13.04 points
A discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how they help advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report is presented. NRS 440 Future of Nursing Report
2. Insufficient
12.38 points
A discussion of the role of state-based action coalitions and how these advance the goals in the National Academy of Sciences report lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The role of state-based action coalitions is omitted or inaccurate.
State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession
Criteria Description
A discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession.
5. Target
33 points
A clear and accurate discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession is present.
4. Acceptable
29.37 points
A detailed discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession is present.
3. Approaching
26.07 points
A discussion of two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession is present.
2. Insufficient
24.75 points
A discussion of initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession lacks detail or is incomplete. NRS 440 Future of Nursing Report
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession is omitted or inaccurate.
Barriers to Advancement
Criteria Description
A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers.
5. Target
33 points
A clear and accurate description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is present.
4. Acceptable
29.37 points
A detailed description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is present.
3. Approaching
26.07 points
A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is present.
2. Insufficient
24.75 points
A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is omitted or inaccurate. NRS 440 Future of Nursing Report
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Target
11.55 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
4. Acceptable
10.28 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
3. Approaching
9.12 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
2. Insufficient
8.66 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
5. Target
11.55 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
4. Acceptable
10.28 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. NRS 440 Future of Nursing Report
3. Approaching
9.12 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
2. Insufficient
8.66 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
Evidence
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
5. Target
9.9 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
4. Acceptable
8.81 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
3. Approaching
7.82 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
2. Insufficient
7.43 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
Mechanics of Writing
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target
9.9 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
8.81 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching
7.82 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
7.43 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target
6.6 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable
5.87 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
5.21 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Insufficient
4.95 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
