Nursing Assignment Acers

NUR 513 Topic 7 Discussion 2 Assignment

NUR 513 Topic 7 Discussion 2 Assignment

NUR 513 Topic 7 Discussion 2 Assignment

Topic 7 DQ 2

Assessment Description

What are some of the major ethical issues in conducting research that impacts the advanced registered nurse? Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research.


Ethical Issues In Conducting Research Sample Approach NUR 513

Study ethics encompasses research process standards, subject dignity protection, and the dissemination of research findings. This is also true in research, where nurses must contend with three societal values: community, healthcare, and science, all of which clash with people’s and societies’ beliefs, posing challenges in nursing research. When conducting research, the following are the primary ethical concerns: Informed consent; beneficence, confidentiality, and privacy protection. 

Informed consent is a fundamental ethical concern in research. According to Gundugurti et al. (2022),  it suggests that a person gives his consent deliberately, willingly, cognitively, and in a plain and transparent approach. Informed consent protects a patient’s right to autonomy. Gundugurti et al. (2022), define autonomy as the capacity to operate individually in accordance with a personalized plan. Informed consent seeks to accept the rights of independent individuals via self-determination. It also seeks to protect individual autonomy and honesty, as well as to avoid attacks on the patient’s dignity. The ethical concept of beneficence relates to being of benefit and not causing damage. According to Fleming and Zegwaard (2018), the beneficent principle involves the professional obligation to do effective and meaningful research to effectively serve and enhance the welfare of participants. According to Gundugurti et al. (2022), beneficence refers to the advantages of the research, whereas non-maleficence refers to the risks associated with participation in the research.  Non-maleficence requires a high level of sensitivity from the researcher about what constitutes damage. Gundugurti et al. (2022), state that harm to the participant can be physiological, emotional, social, and economic in character.

The APRN should act as an advocate for the study participants as a participant while working with persons who are engaged in research (Heck et al., 2022). This necessitates some understanding of participant rights and the safeguards in place for human beings in clinical research. The nurse advocates for the study participants by ensuring that they comprehend the experiment and what exactly they are being required to do, that they obtain the knowledge they need to make knowledgeable decisions before and during the study, and that they are aware of their right to withdrawal without penalty.

  1. Fleming, J., & Zegwaard, K. E. (2018). Methodologies, methods and ethical considerations for conducting research in work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(3), 205–213.
  2. Gundugurti, P. R., Bhattacharyya, R., Kondepi, S., Chakraborty, K., & Mukherjee, A. (2022). Ethics and law. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 64(Suppl 1), S7–S15.
  3. Heck, L. O., Carrara, B. S., Mendes, I. A. C., & Arena Ventura, C. A. (2022). Nursing and advocacy in health: An integrative review. Nursing Ethics, 9697330211062980.

mersin escmersin esc