Nursing Assignment Acers

NUR 550 Topic 2 Translational Research Graphic Organizer

NUR 550 Topic 2 Translational Research Graphic Organizer

NUR 550 Topic 2 Translational Research Graphic Organizer

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparison on different research designs to better understand their designs and application. Understanding the different types of research design is important so that nurses can effectively apply evidence-based research into practice to address issues and offer better patient care.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

You will utilize your approved nursing practice problem to complete the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments for this course and NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

Review feedback from your instructor on your “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identification of Nursing Practice Problem,” submitted in Topic 1. If your original proposed nursing problem was outside the scope of nursing practice or not conducive to an evidence-based practice project proposal, work with your instructor to identify a new topic prior to beginning this assignment. If your proposed topic requires revision, complete this prior to beginning this assignment.

Conduct a literature search on your approved nursing practice problem. Find two translational research articles, one quantitative article, and one qualitative article. Using the “Translational Research Graphic Organizer,” present your proposed topic and, in the tables provided, compare one translational study to the quantitative study, and one translational study to the qualitative study.

NUR 550 Topic 2 Translational Research Graphic Organizer

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Attachments

Translational Research Graphic Organizer

State the nursing practice problem for your evidence-based practice project. If your nursing problem has not yet been approved, make any required changes or revisions to your nursing practice problem prior to starting the assignment. Using your proposed topic, conduct a literature search and complete the tables below.

Nursing Practice Problem:

 

Comparison 1: Translational Research vs. Qualitative Research

Criteria Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link:

 

Translational Research Type:

 

Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link:

 

Traditional Qualitative Research Type:

Observations (Similarities/Differences)
Methodology  

 

 

 

 

 

   
Goals  

 

                                  

 

 

 

   
Data Collection  

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

Comparison 2: Translational Research vs. Quantitative Research

            Criteria Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link:

 

Translational Research Type:

Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link:

 

Traditional Quantitative Research Type:

 

Observations (Similarities/Differences)
Methodology  

 

 

 

 

 

   
Goals  

 

 

 

 

 

   
Data Collection  

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

References

1. Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness

Read Chapters 2 and 3 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness.

2. Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare

Read Chapters 2 and 3 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare.

3. https://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-23-2018/No2-May-2018/Overview-and-Summary-Translational-Research-From-Knowledge-to-Practice.html

4. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/genomics

NUR 550 Topic 2 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Rubric Criteria

Nursing Practice Problem (Revision)

Criteria Description

Nursing Practice Problem (Revision)

5. Excellent

10 points

The nursing practice problem is clearly presented and approved. No revision was required, or all necessary revisions are were made.

4. Good

9.2 points

NA

3. Satisfactory

8.8 points

Revisions were made accordingly to improve the proposed nursing practice problem, but some aspects are inaccurate or unclear. Additional revisions are still required for approval.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

8 points

The changes failed to meet the criteria for a relevant nursing practice problem for an evidence-based practice project proposal. Additional revisions are still required for approval.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The nursing practice problem was not included, or the required revisions were not made.

Translational and Traditional Articles

Criteria Description

Translational and Traditional Articles

5. Excellent

15 points

A quantitative article and a qualitative article were each compared to a translational research article. The articles are peer-reviewed, published within the last five years, and pertain to the nursing practice problem. The assignment criteria are fully met.

4. Good

13.8 points

The articles meet the assignment criteria and provide adequate support for the proposed nursing practice problem.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

One article does not meet the assignment criteria. Overall, the articles generally support the proposed nursing practice problem. The proposed problem would be better supported with the selection of one or two different articles.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

Two articles do not meet the assignment criteria. It is unclear how one or two of the articles support the proposed nursing practice problem.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

More than two articles selected do not meet the assignment criteria. At least one article is omitted.

Comparison of Methodology Between Translational and Traditional Research

Criteria Description

Comparison of Methodology Between Translational and Traditional Research

5. Excellent

15 points

The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is thorough and accurate. A clear understanding of translational and traditional methodologies is demonstrated.

4. Good

13.8 points

The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

A summary comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is omitted.

Comparison of Goals Between Translational and Traditional Research

Criteria Description

Comparison of Goals Between Translational and Traditional Research

5. Excellent

15 points

The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is thorough and accurate. An understanding of goals between traditional and translational research is evident.

4. Good

13.8 points

A comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

A summary comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is omitted.

Comparison of Data Collection Between Translational and Traditional Research

Criteria Description

Comparison of Data Collection Between Translational and Traditional Research

5. Excellent

15 points

The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is thorough and accurate. An understanding of goals between traditional and translational research is evident.

4. Good

13.8 points

The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

A summary comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is omitted.

Observations (Similarities and Differences)

Criteria Description

Observations (Similarities and Differences)

5. Excellent

20 points

The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are detailed and informative.

4. Good

18.4 points

The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy

3. Satisfactory

17.6 points

The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are summarized. More information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

16 points

The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are only partially discussed. The narrative is vague and contains inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are not discussed.

Mechanics of Writing

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5. Excellent

5 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed

Documentation of Source

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. NUR 550 Topic 2 Translational Research Graphic Organizer

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

mersin escmersin esc