Nursing Assignment Acers

NUR 550 Topic 4 Critical Appraisal Of Research

NUR 550 Topic 4 Critical Appraisal Of Research

NUR 550 Topic 4 Critical Appraisal Of Research

Objectives:

  1. Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design.
  2. Analyze the reliability and validity of methods and results in a translational research article.
  3. Describe strategies to maintain the integrity of translational research.
  4. Discuss challenges of research design and data collections.
Topic 4 DQ 1

Assessment Description

Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design. Using a translational research article from your graphic organizer, analyze the methods and results sections to discuss reliability and validity as it relates to the translational research. Include the permalink to the article in your reference.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

Topic 4 DQ 2

Assessment Description

Identify a data collection tool you could use for your research. Consider how you could employ translational research to potentially overcome barriers, which may arise during data collection. Identify the best type of translational research to address this barrier and provide rationale for the type you have chosen. What strategies would you employ to provide an understanding of your chosen type of translational research and to gather collaborative support?

Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper

Assessment Description

Refer to the PICOT you developed for your evidence-based practice project proposal. If your PICOT required revision, include those revisions in this assignment. You will use your PICOT paper for all subsequent assignments you develop as part of your evidence-based practice project proposal in this course and in NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

NUR 550 Topic 4 Critical Appraisal Of Research

Write a 750-1,000-word paper that describes your PICOT.

  1. Describe the population’s demographics and health concerns.
  2. Describe the proposed evidence-based intervention and explain how your proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus.
  3. Compare your intervention to previous practice or research.
  4. Explain what the expected outcome is for the intervention.
  5. Describe the time for implementing the intervention and evaluating the outcome.
  6. Explain how nursing science, social determinants of health, and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population.
  7. Create an Appendix for your paper and attach the PICOT. Be sure to review feedback from your previous submission and revise your PICOT accordingly.
  8. Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as the final appendix at the end of your paper.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite at least four to six peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. NUR 550 Topic 4 Critical Appraisal Of Research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSNMSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing

MS Nursing: Public Health

MS Nursing: Education

MS Nursing: Acute Care Nurse Practitioner

MS Nursing: Family Nurse Practitioner

MS Nursing: Health Care Quality and Patient Safety

4.1: Synthesize nursing science, determinants of health, and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data in the management of population health.

Rubric Criteria

Population Demographics and Health Concerns

Criteria Description

Population Demographics and Health Concerns

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are accurate and thoroughly described using substantial evidence.

4. Good

6.9 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are described using sufficient evidence.

3. Satisfactory

6.6 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are summarized. More information and supporting evidence are needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are incorrect or only partially described.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The demographics and health concerns for the population are not described.

Proposed Evidence-Based Intervention

Criteria Description

Proposed Evidence-Based Intervention

5. Excellent

19.5 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is well-developed and clearly described. Explanation of how the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is thorough.

4. Good

17.94 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is described. Explanation of how the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is adequate. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Satisfactory

17.16 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is outlined. Explanation of how the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is general. Some aspects are unclear. More information is needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

15.6 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is incomplete. It is unclear how the proposed intervention incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The proposed evidence-based intervention is omitted.

Comparison of Intervention to Current Research

Criteria Description

Comparison of Intervention to Current Research

5. Excellent

18 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is thorough and clearly presented.

4. Good

16.56 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is adequately presented.

3. Satisfactory

15.84 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is generally presented. Some areas are vague.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14.4 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Comparison of intervention to previous practice or research is omitted.

Expected Outcome for Intervention

Criteria Description

Expected Outcome for Intervention

5. Excellent

15 points

The expected outcome for the intervention is thoroughly explained using substantial evidence.

4. Good

13.8 points

The expected outcome for the intervention is explained using sufficient evidence.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

The expected outcome is for the intervention is summarized. More information and supporting evidence is needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

The expected outcome is for the intervention is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The expected outcome is for the intervention is omitted.

Time Estimated for Implementing Intervention and Evaluating Outcome

Criteria Description

Time Estimated for Implementing Intervention and Evaluating Outcome

5. Excellent

15 points

A description of the timeline is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.

4. Good

13.8 points

A description of the timelines is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

A description of the timeline is included but lacks evidence.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

A description of the timeline is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the timeline is not included.

Support (B)

Criteria Description

Support for Population Health Management for Selected Population (C 4.1)

5. Excellent

15 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is thorough. The narrative is insightful and demonstrates an understanding of how the various aspects contribute to population health management for selected populations. NUR 550 Topic 4 Critical Appraisal Of Research

4. Good

13.8 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is adequate. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

3. Satisfactory

13.2 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is summarized. More information and support are needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is incomplete. There are major inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Explanation of how nursing science; social determinants of health; and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data are applied or synthesized to support population health management for the selected population is omitted.

Appendix

Criteria Description

Appendix

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached in the appendix. It is clearly evident by the quality of the paper that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development.

4. Good

6.9 points

The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development of the paper.

3. Satisfactory

6.6 points

The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached in the appendix. The APA Writing Checklist was generally used in development of the paper, but some aspects are inconsistent with the paper format or quality.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6 points

The APA Writing Checklist and PICOT are attached, but an appendix has not been created. The paper does not reflect the use of the APA Writing Checklist during development.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The appendix and required resources are omitted.

Required Sources

Criteria Description

Required Sources

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

4. Good

6.9 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

3. Satisfactory

6.6 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not included.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

10.5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. NUR 550 Topic 4 Critical Appraisal Of Research

4. Good

9.66 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

9.24 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

8.4 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

12 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

11.04 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

10.56 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

9.6 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

6.9 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

6.6 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

7.5 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

6.9 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

6.6 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

6.9 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

6.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

6 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

NUR 550 Topic 4 Critical Appraisal Of Research Resources

  1. Scoping Implementation Science for the Beginner: Locating Yourself on the “Subway Line” of Translational Research

Read “Scoping Implementation Science for the Beginner: Locating Yourself on the ‘Subway Line’ of Translational Research,” by Lane-Fall, Curran, and Beidas, from BMC Medical Research Methodology (2019). https://web-s-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=89da7ef1-76d4-42e5-9638-47614aebb39d%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=137228606&db=ccm

2. Aligning Evidence-Based Practice With Translational Research: Opportunities for Clinical Practice Research

Read “Aligning Evidence-Based Practice With Translational Research: Opportunities for Clinical Practice Research,” by Weiss et al., from JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration (2018). https://ovidsp-dc2-ovid-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovid-b/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=434f4e1a73d37e8ca9c2ed569e2a6bcbf735c84929bc28269144859efadf4a029f63479ab9fe4cf3c0aeb16d16c569463e1805bdda284f413ad0736f95c11ef3d0d6b609ec1d4bc8aca992e61742b08a7fbf90312aa8a6fe9e3b058c5ad6f607beb15adf3e9952cefba087720aba4bc7458e14c55667e6a0ec1a52812ee6a05c63e784c11e0c64683b27dbc8b0bbd2af9d07ebf68b5d1475425636a7dddbddffa5ad3bfc2fc9bc93557ae431567c109678d64a749f59400675d2693bad60d6725a2c58077fabfbde8845cadc8527c757464ee7cd61f87d6a

3. Work as an Inclusive Part of Population Health Inequities Research and Prevention

Read “Work as an Inclusive Part of Population Health Inequities Research and Prevention,” by Ahonen et al., from American Journal of Public Health (2018). https://web-s-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=85d6bce7-f01c-4f18-875e-e85593008b27%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=127874083&db=a9h

4. Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare

Read Chapters 5 and 6 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781496386892/epub/OEBPS/xhtml/01_title.html#page_i

5. Environmental Health Sciences in a Translational Research Framework: More than Benches and Bedsides

Read “Environmental Health Sciences in a Translational Research Framework: More than Benches and Bedsides,” by Kaufman and Curl, from Environmental Health Perspectives (2019). https://web-s-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=0e7f5086-af2d-4e90-aa70-627d722e45ca%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=136273871&db=ofs

6. Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness

Read Chapters 1 and 6 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781284166613/

mersin escmersin esc