Nursing Assignment Acers

NUR 550 Topic 7 Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review

NUR 550 Topic 7 Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review

NUR 550 Topic 7 Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to write a review of the research articles you evaluated in your Topic 5 “Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature” assignment. If you have been directed by your instructor to select different articles in order to meet the requirements for a literature review or to better support your evidence-based practice project proposal, complete this step prior to writing your review.

A literature review provides a concise comparison of the literature for the reader and explains how the research demonstrates support for your PICOT. You will use the literature review in this assignment in NUR-590, during which you will write a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

In a paper of 1,250-1,500, select eight of the ten articles you evaluated that demonstrate clear support for your evidence-based practice and complete the following for each article:

  1. Introduction – Describe the clinical issue or problem you are addressing. Present your PICOT statement.
  2. Search methods – Describe your search strategy and the criteria that you used in choosing and searching for your articles.
  3. Synthesis of the literature – For each article, write a paragraph discussing the main components (subjects, methods, key findings) and provide rationale for how the article supports your PICOT.
  4. Comparison of articles – Compare the articles (similarities and differences, themes, methods, conclusions, limitations, controversies).
  5. Suggestions for future research: Based on your analysis of the literature, discuss identified gaps and which areas require further research.
  6. Conclusion – Provide a summary statement of what you found in the literature.
  7. Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite eight peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSNMSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing

3.2: Analyze appropriate research from databases and other information sources to improve health care practices and processes.

NUR 550 Topic 7 Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review Resources

  1. Health Policy and Health Services Delivery

    Read “Health Policy and Health Services Delivery,” by Tullai-McGuinness and Reimer, from Encyclopedia of Nursing Research (2017). https://search-credoreference-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/content/entry/spennurres/health_policy_and_health_services_delivery/0?institutionId=5865

     

  2. Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession

    Read Chapter 9 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781284176216/epub/EPUB/xhtml/9781284176124_Title.html#page_i

     

  3. Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness

    Read Chapter 7 and review Chapter 10 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781284166613/

     

  4. The Untapped Potential of the Nurse Practitioner Workforce in Reducing Health Disparities

    Read “The Untapped Potential of the Nurse Practitioner Workforce in Reducing Health Disparities,” by Poghsyan and Carthon, from Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice (2017). https://journals-sagepub-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/doi/full/10.1177/1527154417721189

     

  5. Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare

    Review Chapter 19 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare. https://bibliu.com/app/?bibliuMagicToken=nqKeJ7JKReUvJVgNGFoafX0DArneBLft#/view/books/9781496386892/

     

  6. How to Write a Literature Review in 30 Minutes or Less

    View “How to Write a Literature Review in 30 Minutes or Less,” by Taylor, located on YouTube (2017). https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=TdJxY4w9XKY

Rubric Criteria

Introduction

Criteria Description

Introduction

5. Excellent

8.75 points

The clinical issue or problem and PICOT statement are thoroughly described.

4. Good

8.05 points

The clinical issue or problem and PICOT statement are adequately described.

3. Satisfactory

7.7 points

The clinical issue or problem and PICOT statement are presented. Some aspects are vague. There are minor inaccuracies.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

7 points

The clinical issue or problem and PICOT statement are incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The clinical issue or problem and PICOT statement are omitted.

Search Methods

Criteria Description

Search Methods

5. Excellent

17.5 points

The search strategy and criteria used in choosing and searching for articles is thoroughly described.

4. Good

16.1 points

The search strategy and criteria used in choosing and searching for articles are described. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Satisfactory

15.4 points

The search strategy and criteria used in choosing and searching for articles are summarized. More information is needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14 points

The search strategy and criteria used in choosing and searching for articles are only partially described.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The search strategy and criteria used in choosing and searching for articles are omitted. NUR 550 Topic 7 Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review

Synthesis of Literature

Criteria Description

Synthesis of Literature

5. Excellent

17.5 points

A well-developed paragraph for each article is presented. The main components (subjects, methods, key findings) are thoroughly discussed, and substantial rationale for how each article supports the PICOT is clearly provided.

4. Good

16.1 points

A paragraph for each article is presented. The main components (subjects, methods, key findings) are adequately discussed, and rationale for how each article supports the PICOT is provided. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Satisfactory

15.4 points

A summary for each article is presented. The main components (subjects, methods, key findings) are generally discussed. General rationale for how each article supports the PICOT is provided. More information is needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14 points

All articles are presented, but the synthesis of literature is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A paragraph for one or more article is missing.

Comparison of Articles

Criteria Description

Comparison of Articles

5. Excellent

17.5 points

A detailed comparison of the similarities, differences, themes, methods, conclusions, limitations, and controversies among the articles is thoroughly presented.

4. Good

16.1 points

A comparison of the similarities, differences, themes, methods, conclusions, limitations, and controversies among the articles is adequately presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Satisfactory

15.4 points

A general comparison of the similarities, differences, themes, methods, conclusions, limitations, and controversies among the articles is presented. Some aspects are unclear. More information is needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14 points

All articles are presented, but the comparison is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

One or more article is missing in the comparison.

Suggestions for Future Research

Criteria Description

Suggestions for Future Research

5. Excellent

17.5 points

Identified gaps and areas requiring further research are thoroughly discussed and clearly based on the analysis of the literature. The narrative is insightful and demonstrates an understanding of research analysis necessary for future study.

4. Good

16.1 points

Identified gaps and areas requiring further research are adequately discussed. The narrative is based on the analysis of the literature. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Satisfactory

15.4 points

Some identified gaps and areas requiring further research are generally discussed. The narrative is generally based on the analysis of the literature. More information is needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14 points

Identified gaps and areas requiring further research are only partially presented.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Identified gaps and areas requiring further research are omitted.

Conclusion

Criteria Description

Conclusion

5. Excellent

8.75 points

The conclusion is well-developed and presents a clear and accurate summary statement of what was found in the literature.

4. Good

8.05 points

The conclusion presents an adequate summary statement of what was found in the literature.

3. Satisfactory

7.7 points

The conclusion presents a vague summary statement of was found in the literature. There are inaccuracies.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

7 points

A conclusion is presented but fails to present a summary statement of what was found in the literature.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The conclusion is omitted.

Ability to Analyze (B)

Criteria Description

Ability to Analyze (C3.2)

5. Excellent

17.5 points

The literature review presented demonstrates a strong ability to analyze appropriate research from databases and other information sources to improve health care practices and processes.

4. Good

16.1 points

The literature review presented demonstrates an adequate ability to analyze appropriate research from databases and other information sources to improve health care practices and processes.

3. Satisfactory

15.4 points

The literature review presented demonstrates a general ability to analyze appropriate research from databases and other information sources to improve health care practices and processes.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14 points

The literature review presented does not consistently demonstrate an ability to analyze appropriate research from databases and other information sources to improve health care practices and processes.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The literature review presented does not demonstrate an ability to analyze appropriate research from databases and other information sources to improve health care practices and processes.

Appendix

Criteria Description

Appendix

5. Excellent

8.75 points

The APA Writing Checklist is attached in the appendix. It is clearly evident by the quality of the paper that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development.

4. Good

8.05 points

The APA Writing Checklist is attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development of the paper.

3. Satisfactory

7.7 points

The APA Writing Checklist is attached and in the appendix. The APA Writing Checklist was generally used in development of the paper, but some aspects are inconsistent with the paper format or quality.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

7 points

The APA Writing Checklist is attached, but an appendix has not been created. The paper does not reflect the use of the APA Writing Checklist during development

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The appendix and required resources are omitted.

Required Sources

Criteria Description

Required Sources

5. Excellent

8.75 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

4. Good

8.05 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

3. Satisfactory

7.7 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

7 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not included.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

12.25 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

11.27 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

10.78 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

9.8 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

14 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

12.88 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

12.32 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

11.2 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

8.75 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

8.05 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. NUR 550 Topic 7 Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review

3. Satisfactory

7.7 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

7 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

8.75 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

8.05 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

7.7 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

7 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

8.75 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

8.05 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

7.7 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

7 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total175 points
mersin escmersin esc