Nursing Assignment Acers

NUR 630 Performance Improvement and Quality in Health Care

NUR 630 Performance Improvement and Quality in Health Care

NUR 630 Performance Improvement and Quality in Health Care

Course Description
This course examines models of performance and quality improvement in health care. Learners differentiate measures of quality and learn to apply industry standard tools and process improvement methodology to enhance safety and positively impact patient outcomes and financial performance.

Class Materials

 

Class Resources
Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care

Johnson J. K., & Sollecito, W. A. (2020). Continuous quality improvement in health care (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN-13: 9781284126594

Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement

Fondahn, E., Lane, M., & Vannucci, A. (2016). Washington manual of patient safety and quality improvement. Wolters Kluwer. ISBN-13: 9781451193558

View Resource

Beat the deadline

Order today and get your high-quality custom paper within hours.

Nursing Assignment
LopesWrite

Refer to the LopesWrite webpage for guidance regarding assignments requiring submission to LopesWrite.

 

NUR 630 Performance Improvement and Quality in Health Care Topic 1: Differentiating Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research

Max Points:110

Objectives:

  1. Analyze quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research.

Assessments

 

Summary of Current Course Content Knowledge

Start Date

Feb 16, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Feb 16, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
0
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

Academic engagement through active participation in instructional activities related to the course objectives is paramount to your success in this course and future courses.  Through interaction with your instructor and classmates, you will explore the course material and be provided with the best opportunity for objective and competency mastery.  To begin this class, review the course objectives for each Topic, and then answer the following questions as this will help guide your instructor for course instruction.

  1. Which weekly objectives do you have prior knowledge of and to what extent?
  2. Which weekly objectives do you have no prior knowledge of?
  3. What course-related topics would you like to discuss with your instructor and classmates?  What questions or concerns do you have about this course?
Class Introductions

Start Date

Feb 16, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Feb 18, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
0
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

Take a moment to explore your new classroom and introduce yourself to your fellow classmates. What are you excited about learning? What do you think will be most challenging?

NUR 630 Performance Improvement and Quality in Health Care Topic 1 DQ 1

Start Date

Feb 16, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Feb 18, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

You are assigned to a quality team on a rehabilitation floor where patient falls are on the rise. What strategy would be best to approach this issue—quality improvement, evidence-based practice, or research? Support your choice with one or two examples and one or two references.

NUR 630 Performance Improvement and Quality in Health Care Topic 1 DQ 2

Start Date

Feb 16, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Feb 20, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

Some consider the integration of evidence-based practice a “cookbook” approach. Do you agree or disagree? Explain. Support your position with one or two examples and one or two references.

Topic 1 Assignment Visual Model

Start Date

Feb 16, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Feb 22, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
80
Rubric

View Rubric

Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to differentiate quality improvement (QI), evidence-based practice (EBP), and research.

Create a graphic image or visual model differentiating quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research. You can use PowerPoint, Smart Art in Word, or other software that creates a graphic. Be creative in your design. Include the following information in your graphic image or visual model:

  1. Compare and contrast quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research. Identify at least one similarity and difference for each.
  2. Provide an example of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research.
  3. Explain why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting.
  4. This assignment requires a minimum of two peer-reviewed scholarly sources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Rubric Criteria

Compare and Contrast Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research

Criteria Description

Compare and Contrast Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research

5. Target

8 points

Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research and is thorough.

4. Acceptable

7.36 points

Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research and is detailed.

3. Approaching

7.04 points

Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research.

2. Insufficient

6.4 points

Visual model compares and contrasts quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research, but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Visual model does not compare and contrast quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research.

Examples of Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research

Criteria Description

Examples of Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research

5. Target

8 points

Three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present. All examples are appropriate.

4. Acceptable

7.36 points

Three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present. Most examples are appropriate.

3. Approaching

7.04 points

Three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present.

2. Insufficient

6.4 points

Less than three examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Examples of quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are not present.

Application of Examples of Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research

Criteria Description

Application of Examples of Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research

5. Target

8 points

A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present and thorough.

4. Acceptable

7.36 points

A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present and detailed.

3. Approaching

7.04 points

A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present.

2. Insufficient

6.4 points

A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is present, but lacks details or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of why quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research would be applied in a health care setting is not present.

Scholarly Sources

Criteria Description

Scholarly Sources

5. Target

8 points

A minimum of two peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

4. Acceptable

7.36 points

A minimum of two peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

3. Approaching

7.04 points

A minimum of two peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present.

2. Insufficient

6.4 points

One or two sources are present, but are not scholarly. Limited research is present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are not present.

Technical Requirements: Graphics

Criteria Description

Technical Requirements: Graphics

5. Target

24 points

Graphics are used in the visual model and visual connections contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.

4. Acceptable

22.08 points

Graphics are used in the visual model and visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships.

3. Approaching

21.12 points

Graphics are used in the visual model.

2. Insufficient

19.2 points

Graphics are used in the visual model, but they are distracting.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

No graphics are used in the visual model.

Aesthetic Quality

Criteria Description

Aesthetic Quality

5. Target

5.6 points

Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.

4. Acceptable

5.15 points

Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.

3. Approaching

4.93 points

Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.

2. Insufficient

4.48 points

Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality.

Appropriateness

Criteria Description

Appropriateness

5. Target

5.6 points

Student shows a deep understanding of the audience and the situation by selecting material that enhances understanding. Student creates tools, techniques, or paradigms that effectively achieve the desired goal.

4. Acceptable

5.15 points

Student selects an effective tool, technique, or paradigm to achieve the desired goal as defined in the project or course guideline. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are appropriate for the audience and the situation.

3. Approaching

4.93 points

Student selects a tool, technique, or paradigm that achieves a basic representation as defined in the project or course guideline. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are appropriate for the audience and the situation but some of the development of the material is inadequate.

2. Insufficient

4.48 points

Student selection of a tool, technique, or paradigm does not relate to the project or course goal. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are not appropriate for the audience and the situation and are inadequately developed.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

There is no evidence that the student has selected an effective tool, technique, or paradigm to achieve the goal as defined in the project or course guideline. Materials (photo, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) are missing.

Synthesis

Criteria Description

Synthesis

5. Target

4.8 points

Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified.

4. Acceptable

4.42 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified.

3. Approaching

4.22 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing.

2. Insufficient

3.84 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5. Target

4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Format/Documentation

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

5. Target

4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable

3.68 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching

3.52 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient

3.2 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

 

Topic 1 Participation

Start Date

Feb 16, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Feb 22, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

There is no description for this assessment.

Resources

Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care

Read Chapter 1 in Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care.

Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement

Read Chapter 2 in Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement.

10 Easy Design Tips to Improve Your Visual Content

Read “10 Easy Design Tips to Improve Your Visual Content,” by French, located on the Column Five Media website.

… 

Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research

Read “Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, and Research,” by Fowler, from Home Healthcare Now (2021).

Development and Implementation of a Model for Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement, and Innovation

Read “Development and Implementation of a Model for Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement, and Innovation,” by H

… 

Clostridium Difficile: Reducing Infections Using an Evidence-Based Practice Initiative

Read “Clostridium Difficile: Reducing Infections Using an Evidence-Based Practice Initiative,” by Nielsen, Sanchez-Vargas, a

… 

Using the PDSA Model Correctly

Read “Using the PDSA Model Correctly,” by Connelly, from Medsurg Nursing (2021).

 

Topic 2: Health Care Culture

Max Points:130

Objectives:

  1. Apply concepts of a “just culture.”
  2. Describe strategies for implementing a culture of safety and excellence.
  3. Explain how Christian worldview principles (CWV) can be used to improve health care culture.

Assessments

 

Topic 2 DQ 1

Start Date

Feb 23, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Feb 25, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

Using the AHRQ SOPS Surveys webpage, provided in the topic Resources, select the SOPS survey appropriate for the practice setting in which you work. Complete the survey at your site and discuss how your facility scored. What changes would you recommend based on the survey results?

 

Topic 2 DQ 2

Start Date

Feb 23, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Feb 27, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

Two nurses make a medication error: One causes an adverse event with a patient and the other does not. Should the nurses be disciplined, and, if so, should they be disciplined the same way? Why or why not? How would this be addressed in a just culture?

 

Health Care Culture

Start Date

Feb 23, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 1, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
100
Rubric

View Rubric

Status
Upcoming
Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to discuss health care culture and describe how CWV can be used to improve ethical practices. In a 1,000-1,250-word essay, discuss the important factors associated with health care culture. Include the following in your essay:

  1. A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and safety.
  2. Two or three examples of principles for building a culture of excellence and safety.
  3. An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture.
  4. An explanation of how Christian worldview (CWV) principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices, whether the organizations are Christian or not.
  5. Two or three examples of how the integration of faith learning and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture.

This assignment requires a minimum of three peer-reviewed scholarly sources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

 

Topic 2 Participation

Start Date

Feb 23, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 1, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

There is no description for this assessment.

Resources

Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care

Read Chapters 2 and 9 in Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care.

Optional:

For add

… 

Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement

Read Chapter 12 in Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement.

Integration of Faith, Learning and Work at Grand Canyon University

Read “Integration of Faith, Learning and Work at Grand Canyon University,” located on the Grand Canyon University website. Use th

… 

SOPS Surveys

Review the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety (SOPS) surveys provided on the SOPS Surveys page of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Q

… 

Transformational Leadership Principles and Tactics for the Nurse Executive to Shift Nursing Culture

Read “Transformational Leadership Principles and Tactics for the Nurse Executive to Shift Nursing Culture,” by Pearson, from

… 

Just Culture: The Foundation of Staff Safety in the Perioperative Environment

Read “Just Culture: The Foundation of Staff Safety in the Perioperative Environment,” by Fencl, Willoughby, and Jackson, from

… 

Flag the Play: Overcoming Unseen Barriers to Speak Up for Safety

Read “‘Flag the Play’: Overcoming Unseen Barriers to Speak Up for Safety,” by Hollinger, from Nursing Management (2019).

… 

A Network Analysis of Perioperative Communication Patterns

Read “A Network Analysis of Perioperative Communication Patterns,” by Stucky, De Jong, Kabo, and Kasper, from AORN 

… 

Building a Culture of Safety and Quality: The Paradox of Measurement

Read “Building a Culture of Safety and Quality: The Paradox of Measurement,” by Bliss, Chambers, and Rambur, from Nursin

… 

 

Topic 3: Performance Improvement Theory and Models

Max Points:50

Objectives:

  1. Recommend performance improvement theories and models.

Assessments

 

Topic 3 DQ 1

Start Date

Mar 2, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 4, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

Your unit data reflect an upward trend in blood administration errors. Is this likely an individual failure or a system failure? Which performance improvement theory or model would you use to address it?

 

Topic 3 DQ 2

Start Date

Mar 2, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 6, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

Select a problem that you have experienced or identified within your workplace or in a health care setting. What steps would you take to address the problem?

 

CLC – CLC Agreement

Start Date

Mar 2, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 8, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Traits

Group

Assessment Description

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

Meet with your instructor-assigned group to review the Topic 4 assignment and familiarize yourselves with the expectations for the project.

Fill out the attached “CLC Agreement” form and submit it to the instructor

Attachments

 

Topic 3 Participation

Start Date

Mar 2, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 8, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

There is no description for this assessment.

Resources

Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care

Read Chapter 10 and review Chapter 2 in Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care.

Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement

Read Chapter 4 in Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement.

The ED Nurse Manager’s Guide to Utilizing SWOT Analysis for Performance Improvement

Read “The ED Nurse Manager’s Guide to Utilizing SWOT Analysis for Performance Improvement,” by Hollingsworth and Reynolds, f

… 

Lean Management and Breakthrough Performance Improvement in Health Care

Read “Lean Management and Breakthrough Performance Improvement in Health Care,” by Ahn, Rundall, Shortell, Blodgett, and Reponen,

… 

Using Performance Improvement to Enhance Time‐Out Compliance and Prevent Wrong‐Site Surgery

Read “Using Performance Improvement to Enhance Time‐Out Compliance and Prevent Wrong‐Site Surgery,” by Vance, Proctor

… 

Improving Throughput in Interventional Radiology: A Team Collaboration

Read “Improving Throughput in Interventional Radiology: A Team Collaboration,” by Sattler, Morrison, Powell, and Steele,

… 

Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare

Read “Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change M

… 

COVID-19 and Nurse-Sensitive Indicators: Using Performance Improvement Teams to Address Quality Indicators During a Pandemic

Read “COVID-19 and Nurse-Sensitive Indicators: Using Performance Improvement Teams to Address Quality Indicators During a Pandemic,&#

… 

 

Topic 4: Quality Models: Lean, Six Sigma, 5S

Max Points:130

Objectives:

  1. Describe quality models in health care.
  2. Describe how quality models are applied in health care.

Assessments

 

Topic 4 DQ 1

Start Date

Mar 9, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 11, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

You are a member of an operating room team. The hospital is reporting an increase in complication rates from your team. Choose one of the quality models and explain how you would use it to address the causes or the adverse events.

 

Topic 4 DQ 2

Start Date

Mar 9, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 13, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

You are the nurse leader on an obstetrics unit. You have been tasked to utilize a Six Sigma approach for standardizing the discharge process. Where do you start?

 

CLC – Quality Models

Start Date

Mar 9, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 15, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
100
Rubric

View Rubric

Status
Upcoming
Assessment Traits

Group

Assessment Description

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

The purpose of this assignment is to examine quality models used in health care. With your CLC group, create a 12-15 slide PowerPoint on Lean, Six Sigma, and 5S quality models. Include the following in your presentation:

  1. A description of each quality model.
  2. A brief history of each quality model.
  3. A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting.
  4. Include a title slide, references slide, and comprehensive speaker notes.
  5. Use a minimum of four peer-reviewed, scholarly references as evidence.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

 

Topic 4 Participation

Start Date

Mar 9, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 15, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

There is no description for this assessment.

Resources

Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care

Read Chapter 5 in Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care.

Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement

Read Chapter 5 in Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement.

Decreasing Wait Times and Increasing Patient Satisfaction: A Lean Six Sigma Approach

Read “Decreasing Wait Times and Increasing Patient Satisfaction: A Lean Six Sigma Approach,” by Godley and Jenkins, from Jour

… 

Module 4. Approaches to Quality Improvement

Read “Module 4. Approaches to Quality Improvement,” from the Practice Facilitation Handbook (2013), located on the Agenc

… 

Using Lean Six Sigma to Increase the Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Program

Read “Using Lean Six Sigma to Increase the Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Program,” by Lavin and Vet

… 

Following Lean and the 5S Philosophy Can Make Quality Improvement Sustainable

Read “Following Lean and the 5S Philosophy Can Make Quality Improvement Sustainable,” from Same-Day Surgery (2020).

… 

 

Topic 5: Outcome Measures vs. Process Measures

Max Points:150

Objectives:

  1. Differentiate outcome and process measures.
  2. Create outcome and process measures for a health care scenario.
  3. Create a data-driven, cost-effective solution to a health care challenge.

Assessments

 

Topic 5 DQ 1

Start Date

Mar 16, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 18, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

Measurement is required to determine the success of your CQI project. What is the difference between outcome and process measures? Which are more important? Why? Support your reasoning with an example.

 

Topic 5 DQ 2

Start Date

Mar 16, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 20, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

Identify which one of the following approaches you would choose to assist in determining and measuring outcomes: FMEA, Pareto principle, and control charts. Describe the best approach and explain why you chose it.

 

Benchmark – Outcome and Process Measures

Start Date

Mar 16, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 22, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
120
Rubric

View Rubric

Status
Upcoming
Assessment Traits

Benchmark
Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

In a 1,000-1,250-word paper, consider the outcome and process measures that can be used for CQI. Include the following in your essay:

  1. At least two process measures that can be used for CQI.
  2. At least one outcome measure that can be used for CQI.
  3. A description of why each measure was chosen.
  4. An explanation of how data would be collected for each (how each will be measured).
  5. An explanation of how success would be determined.
  6. One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge.

Use a minimum of three peer-reviewed scholarly references as evidence.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:

MSN Leadership in Health Care Systems

6.5: Generate data-driven, cost-effective solutions to organizational challenges.

 

Topic 5 Participation

Start Date

Mar 16, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 22, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

There is no description for this assessment.

Resources

Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care

Read Chapter 4 in Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care.

Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement

Review Chapters 2 and 4 in Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement.

Key Questions When Choosing Health Care Quality Measures

Read “Key Questions When Choosing Health Care Quality Measures,” located on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

… 

Select Health Care Quality Measures for a Consumer Report

Explore the Select Measures to Report page of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) website.

Data-Driven Quality Improvement, Culture Change, and the High Reliability Journey at a Special Hospital for People With Medically Complex Developmental Disabilities

Read “Data-Driven Quality Improvement, Culture Change, and the High Reliability Journey at a Special Hospital for People With Medical

… 

Using the Quality Improvement (QI) Tool Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to Examine Implementation Barriers to Common Workflows in Integrated Pediatric Care

Read “Using the Quality Improvement (QI) Tool Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to Examine Implementation Barriers to Common

… 

Developing a Data-Driven Approach in Order to Improve the Safety and Quality of Patient Care

Read “Developing a Data-Driven Approach in Order to Improve the Safety and Quality of Patient Care,” by Cascini, Santaroni,&

… 

Applying the Pareto Principle and a Targeted Education Intervention Following Audit and Feedback to Drive Behavior Changes in the Use of Technology

Read “Applying the Pareto Principle and a Targeted Education Intervention Following Audit and Feedback to Drive Behavior Changes in t

… 

Measuring Nursing Care Value, Big Data, and the Challenges of Estimating Causal Effects

Read “Measuring Nursing Care Value, Big Data, and the Challenges of Estimating Causal Effects,” by Perraillon, Welton,

… 

Sepsis and Septic Shock After Craniotomy: Predicting a Significant Patient Safety and Quality Outcome Measure

Read “Sepsis and Septic Shock After Craniotomy: Predicting a Significant Patient Safety and Quality Outcome Measure,” by Zhang, L

… 

 

Topic 6: Overview of Quality Data

Max Points:110

Objectives:

  1. Differentiate primary and secondary data.
  2. Describe limitations to health care data.
  3. Compare quality sources of health care data.

Assessments

 

Topic 6 DQ 1

Start Date

Mar 23, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 25, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

What is the difference between primary and secondary data? How can primary and secondary source data be used to drive CQI? Provide a specific example of how each source can be used to drive CQI.

 

Topic 6 DQ 2

Start Date

Mar 23, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 27, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

Describe at least two limitations to both primary and secondary data and how understanding those limitations can improve your future CQI work.

 

Quality Data Sources

Start Date

Mar 23, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 29, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
80
Rubric

View Rubric

Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to become familiar with various data sources used by health care organizations to obtain quality data. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) creates an annual report, the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report, which assesses the performance of the U.S. health care system. This report identifies strengths and weaknesses of the health care system in addition to disparities for access to health care and quality of health care. The report is based on more than 250 measures of quality and disparities, and it covers a broad range of health care services and settings.

Access the most current report using the “National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports” AHRQ website, provided in the topic Resources. Select five data sources from this report and fill in the required components on the “Quality Data Sources Organizer.”

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Attachments

 

Topic 6 Participation

Start Date

Mar 23, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 29, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

There is no description for this assessment.

Resources

Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care

Review Chapters 2 and 4 in Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care.

Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement

Review Chapter 4 in Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement.

National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports

Review the most current “National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report” provided on the National Healthcare Quality and

… 

TJC: Quality Improvement Should Include Data Analysis on Equitable Care

Read “TJC: Quality Improvement Should Include Data Analysis on Equitable Care,” by Even, from Hospital Peer Review (2021

… 

Toolkit for Best Practice Use of Electronic Health Record Data in Quality Improvement

Read “Toolkit for Best Practice Use of Electronic Health Record Data in Quality Improvement,” by Omary, Cox-Henley, Hertzberg,

… 

Analysis of Secondary Data

The Use of Data Collected From mHealth Apps to Inform Evidence‐Based Quality Improvement: An Integrative Review

Read “The Use of Data Collected From mHealth Apps to Inform Evidence‐Based Quality Improvement: An Integrative Review,” by

… 

Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Metrics Data to Enhance Clinical Practice

Read “Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Metrics Data to Enhance Clinical Practice,” by Blackmore, Leonard, Madayag, an

… 

Data Management for Quality Improvement: How to Collect and Manage Data

Read “Data Management for Quality Improvement: How to Collect and Manage Data,” by Au, Murray, and Granger, from AACN Advance

… 

 

Topic 7: Performance Improvement Tools and Reportable Metrics

Max Points:150

Objectives:

  1. Identify stakeholder reporting agencies.
  2. Identify trends in health care data.
  3. Create a presentation of data for stakeholders.

Assessments

 

Topic 7 DQ 1

Start Date

Mar 30, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Apr 1, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

Identify at least two stakeholder agency reporting sources. How do these external reporting groups contribute to or hinder CQI?

 

Topic 7 DQ 2

Start Date

Mar 30, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Apr 3, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
5
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

You are going to present data that have been collected to your administrative group. The focus is on outcome measures and the data collected are unplanned readmission rates at two different hospitals. What format would you choose to display your data and why? What information would you include with the data?

 

Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data

Start Date

Mar 30, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Apr 5, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
120
Rubric

View Rubric

Status
Upcoming
Assessment Traits

Benchmark

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to examine health care data on hospital-associated infections and determine the best methods for presenting the data to stakeholders. Use the scenario below and the “Hospital Associated Infections Data” Excel spreadsheet to complete the assignment.

Scenario

You have been tasked with displaying Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) hospital quality measures data for a 5-year period on four quality measures at your site. After examining the data, identify trends and determine the best way to present the actionable information to stakeholders.

Assignment

Create a 12-15-slide PowerPoint (not including title and reference slides) presenting the data to the stakeholders. Address the following in your PowerPoint:

  1. What conclusions can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period?
  2. What trends do you see for each quality measure over the 5-year period?
  3. When comparing each quality measure, is the quality measure better than, worse than, or no different from the national benchmark over time?
  4. Based on your examination of the data, which of the quality measures should you prioritize and why?
  5. Develop a quality improvement metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience relating to the identified area of opportunity.
  6. Explain how you would monitor the metric and use collected data for improvement.

Include a title slide, references slide, and comprehensive speaker notes.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

Use a minimum of two peer-reviewed, scholarly sources as evidence.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:

MSN Leadership in Health Care Systems

6.6: Develop and monitor continuous quality improvement metrics and measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience.

Attachments

 

Topic 7 Participation

Start Date

Mar 30, 2023, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Apr 5, 2023, 11:59 PM

Points
20
Status
Upcoming

Assessment Description

There is no description for this assessment.

Resources

Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care

Review Chapter 4 in Continuous Quality Improvement in Health Care.

Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement

Read Chapter 6 in Washington Manual of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement.

Performance Improvement: Stages, Steps and Tools

Explore the Performance Improvement: Stages, Steps and Tools page of the IntraHealth International website.

Serious Reportable Events

Explore the Serious Reportable Events page located on the National Quality Forum website.

Talking Quality: Reporting to Consumers on Health Care Quality

Explore the Talking Quality: Reporting to Consumers on Health Care Quality page of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

… 

Medicare Initiatives Improve Hospital Care, Patient Safety

Read “Medicare Initiatives Improve Hospital Care, Patient Safety,” by Conway, from The Hospitalist (2015).

Optimize Data Visualization to Improve Communication About Quality Improvement

Read “Optimize Data Visualization to Improve Communication About Quality Improvement,” by AHC Media, from Case Managemen

… 

The Effectiveness of Continuous Quality Improvement for Developing Professional Practice and Improving Health Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Read “The Effectiveness of Continuous Quality Improvement for Developing Professional Practice and Improving Health Care Outcomes: A

… 

Measuring Patient Safety: The Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System (Past, Present, and Future)

Read “Measuring Patient Safety: The Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System (Past, Present, and Future)” by Classen, Munie

… 

A Primer on Data Visualization in Infection Prevention and Antimicrobial Stewardship

Read “A Primer on Data Visualization in Infection Prevention and Antimicrobial Stewardship,” by Salinas, Kritzman, Kobayashi, Edm

… 

 

Topic 8: Driving and Sustaining Change

Max Points:170

Participation Requirements

Participating in classroom discussion is paramount to the learning experience. Participating in the weekly discussions allows students and instructors to share experiences, investigate complicated subject matter, share expertise, and examine the content from new perspectives. The qualitative participation requirements are:

  • Follow-up responses to classmates’ initial answers or responses that integrate course theories with a practical application of the subject, offering a personal observation or experience, or referencing real-world examples, current events, or presenting current research on the topic.
  • Classroom interaction demonstrating deeper or broader thoughts beyond rephrasing what the textbook has presented on the topic.
  • Responses encouraging further discussion and ongoing dialogue with other students and the instructor in the class.
  • Asking additional, relevant questions about the week’s topic.
  • Communications that are presented in a professional and supportive manner, and with respectful tone.

The participation expectations in this class are:

  • Number of Required Substantive Posts Each Day: 1
  • Number of Required Days: 3

Course Grade Scale

Letter Grade
Percent Range
Point Range
A
97%100%
9701000
A-
93%96.99%
930969.99
B+
89%92.99%
890929.99
B
85%88.99%
850889.99
B-
81%84.99%
810849.99
C+
78%80.99%
780809.99
C
76%77.99%
760779.99
F
0%75.99%
0759.99

mersin esc