Nursing Assignment Acers

NUR-641 Topic 2 Principles for Safe Use of Pharmacologic and Herbal Substances

NUR-641 Topic 2 Principles for Safe Use of Pharmacologic and Herbal Substances

NUR-641 Topic 2 Principles for Safe Use of Pharmacologic and Herbal Substances

Create an 8-9 slide presentation with speaker notes about a selected disease process and drug class. The presentation should provide content specific information on the selected disease process and drug class for staff or learners in a clinical environment.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER PAPERS

Follow these steps:

Select a disease process and a drug class used to treat the disease process.
Describe pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug related to the pathophysiology of the disease process.
Describe the product, its intended use, side effects, adverse reactions, and safety issues.
Identify ethnic, cultural, and genetic differences in patients that may affect the safety or efficacy of medications.
How would you monitor the desired effect is achieved?
Be sure to include three to five references.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Content Lesson Presentation – Rubric

Disease Process and Drug Class

Criteria Description

Disease Process and Drug Class

5. Excellent

25.05 points

A disease process and drug class used to treat the disease process is present.

4. Good

23.05 points

A disease process and drug class used to treat the disease process is presented.

3. Satisfactory

22.04 points

A disease process and drug class used to treat the disease process is adequately presented.

2. Less than Satisfactory

20.04 points

A disease process and drug class used to treat the disease process is present, but incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A disease process and drug class used to treat the disease process is not present.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Criteria Description

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

5. Excellent

25.05 points

A description of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug related to the pathophysiology of the disease process is presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.

4. Good

23.05 points

A description of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug related to the pathophysiology of the disease process is adequately presented. Supporting material is of above average quality and quantity.

3. Satisfactory

22.04 points

A description of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug related to the pathophysiology of the disease process is adequately presented. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.

2. Less than Satisfactory

20.04 points

A description of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug related to the pathophysiology of the disease process is present, but incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug related to the pathophysiology of the disease process is not present.

Product

Criteria Description

Product

5. Excellent

25.05 points

A description of the product, intended use, side effects, adverse reactions, and safety issues is presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.

4. Good

23.05 points

A description of the product, intended use, side effects, adverse reactions, and safety issues is adequately presented. Supporting material is of above average quality and quantity.

3. Satisfactory

22.04 points

A description of the product, intended use, side effects, adverse reactions, and safety issues is adequately presented. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.

2. Less than Satisfactory

20.04 points

A description of the product, intended use, side effects, adverse reactions, and safety issues is present, but incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the product, intended use, side effects, adverse reactions, and safety issues is not present.

Ethnic, Cultural, and Genetic Differences

Criteria Description

Ethnic, Cultural, and Genetic Differences

5. Excellent

25.05 points

A description of ethnic, cultural and genetic differences in patients that may affect the safety or efficacy of medications is presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.

4. Good

23.05 points

A description of ethnic, cultural and genetic differences in patients that may affect the safety or efficacy of medications is adequately presented. Supporting material is of above average quality and quantity.

3. Satisfactory

22.04 points

A description of ethnic, cultural and genetic differences in patients that may affect the safety or efficacy of medications is adequately presented. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.

2. Less than Satisfactory

20.04 points

A description of ethnic, cultural and genetic differences in patients that may affect the safety or efficacy of medications is present, but incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of ethnic, cultural and genetic differences in patients that may affect the safety or efficacy of medications is not present.

Monitor

Criteria Description

Monitor

5. Excellent

25.05 points

A description of how you would monitor the desired affect is presented in a thoughtful and insightful manner. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.

4. Good

23.05 points

A description of how you would monitor the desired affect is adequately presented. Supporting material is of above average quality and quantity. NUR-641 Topic 2 Principles for Safe Use of Pharmacologic and Herbal Substances

3. Satisfactory

22.04 points

A description of how you would monitor the desired affect is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.

2. Less than Satisfactory

20.04 points

A description of how you would monitor the desired affect is present, but incomplete or inaccurate.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of how you would monitor the desired affect is achieved is not present.

Presentation of Content

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent

8.35 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good

7.68 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory

7.35 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory

6.68 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

Layout

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent

8.35 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good

7.68 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory

7.35 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory

6.68 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

5. Excellent

8.35 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

4. Good

7.68 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory

7.35 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory

6.68 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

8.35 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

7.68 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory

7.35 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory

6.68 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

8.35 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

7.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

7.35 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

6.68 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. NUR-641 Topic 2 Principles for Safe Use of Pharmacologic and Herbal Substances

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

mersin escmersin esc