NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

 A Workflow Process for Call Light Management

Patient survey reports show that my unit struggles with our call light process, as this is a Current Method

Our call light system allows for multiple, consecutive calls at a time, and sometimes it can be tough to answer and relay information promptly to the appropriate personnel. Usually, Measuring Tool, Rules, Improvements & Summary.

NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion

 Impact of HITECH on My Organization

 Overall, the impact of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health ACT of 2009 has been very positive at my current facility. The electronic health record Impact of Incentives and Meaningful Use

As listed above, meaningful use incentives are geared towards meeting the goals of … Article of Successful Meaningful Use One of the pivotal goals in meaningful use is decrease in medication errors. Nuckols et al. wrote …

NURS 6051 Week 8 Discussion (Walden)

 Practice Issue

The practice issue to be discussed in this paper is the use of needleless systems by nurses in the ICU. As a travel nurse across the south, I saw a significant disparity in different hospitals.

Health IT Supporting Evidence-Based Practice

As mentioned in this week’s reading assignment, gone are the days when nurses were dependent on local libraries and monthly journals. With the advent of the internet and the on.

NURS 6051 Week 10 Discussion (Walden)

RN PHI Responsibility

 According to the American Nurses Association (ANA), protecting a patient’s … PHI and Portable Devices HealthIT.gov recommends NOT using portable storage devices to transport PHI due to the …My Facility and PHI University Hospital is a Magnet hospital, and it prides itself on using the best evidence-based

NURS 6051 Week 11 Assignment (Walden)

Data/Information/Knowledge/Wisdom Continuum

 As a registered nurse (RN), working in an intensive critical care unit (ICU) is seen as the zenith of clinical skills and knowledge. Every day, you are continuously faced with critical decisions

Clinical Question

Will obtaining the CCRN certificate lead to nurses in the ICU obtaining more critical care knowledge that can lead to wisdom in their role as a nurse?

Data and Information

 The American Nurses Association (ANA) define data as “discrete entities that are described

1. CCRN Search

2. Knowledge on the CCRN

3. Transforming CCRN knowledge to Critical Care Wisdom.

 NURS 6051 Week 11 Discussion (Walden)

Health Literacy Responsibility

According to the U. S. Department of Health and Services (HSS), all public health care Patient Resource to Evaluate Information

One of the best online resources for both patients and health care professionals is the Additional Strategies

According to a 2016 Gallup poll, nurses are once again seen as the most trusted and NURS 6051 Week 11 FINAL PAPER (Walden)

A Patient Guide for Clostridium difficile Walden University: Nursing 6051, Section 9 A Patient Guide for Clostridium difficile Clostridium difficile has been found to be the main cause of gastrointestinal-related death …Health Literacy Promotion Among Patients

The attached brochure was created for the sake of increasing health literacy and … Conclusion

Since C. diff has the potential to kill or significantly disturb the health of patients, it is ...

Rubric Detail

NURS_5051_Week4_ Application_ Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
 Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which workmeets the assigned criteria andwork reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. Points:Points   Range:    27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback: Points:Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback:Points:Points Range: 21(21%) – 23 (23%) Assignment meets most of the expectations. One The required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback: Points:Point s Range: 0(0%) – 20 (20%) Assignment superficially meets some of theexpectations. Two or more required topics areeither not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback:
 Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. Feedback: Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4(4%)Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Feedback:Points:Points Range:       3.5(3.5%)   –   3.5 (3.5%)Purpose of theassignment is vague or off topic. Points:Point s Range: 0(0%) – 3 (3%)Noa purpose statement was provided.
    Feedback: Feedback:
 Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. Points:Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. Feedback: Points:Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8(8%)Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Feedback: Points:Points Range: 7 (7%)– 7 (7%)Shows some degree of understanding of keyconcepts. Feedback: Points:Point s Range: 0(0%) – 6 (6%)Shows a lack ofunderstanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Feedback:
 Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course Points:Points    Range:    18 (18%)       –       20       (20%) Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to support point of view. Feedback: Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17(17%)Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback:Points:Points Range: 14(14%) – 15(15%)Minimall y includes and integrates specific information from 2-3resources to support major Points:Point s Range: 0(0%) – 13 (13%)Include s andintegrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points
resources (i.e. video, required readings, andtextbook) and credible outside resources.  points and point of view. Feedback:and point of view. Feedback:
 Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. Feedback: Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17(17%)Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Feedback:Points:Points Range: 14(14%) – 15 (15%)Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. Feedback: Points:Point s Range: 0(0%) – 13 (13%)Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Feedback:
credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.    
 Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clearpoints that support well developed ideas, flowlogically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas.Sentences are Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity Feedback: Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4(4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback:Points:Points Range: 3.5(3.5%)   –   3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs andsentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%-79% of the time. Feedback: Points:Point s Range: 0(0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback:
clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long andrambling nor short and lacking substance.    
 Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4(4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback:Points:Points Range: 3.5(3.5%)   –   3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points:Point s Range: 0(0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interferes with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:
 Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list. Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback: Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4(4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Feedback:Points:Points Range:       3.5(3.5%)   –   3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Feedback: Points:Point s Range: 0(0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback: