Presentation Identifying Interprofessional Stakeholders

As an advanced registered nurse, you will serve as a leader within your organization.

Part of this role will entail being a change agent, and spurring positive change on behalf of patients, colleagues, and the industry.

Consider a situation you experienced previously where change did not go as planned in your healthcare organization. Create a 10-15-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you will assess the situation and the steps that should have been taken to successfully implement change.

Describe the background of the situation, including the rationale for and goal(s) of the change.

Identify the key interprofessional stakeholders (both internal and external) that should be involved in change efforts.

Discuss an appropriate change theory or model that could be used to achieve results. Outline how you would initiate the change.

Describe the impact to the organization if the change initiative is unsuccessful again, and potential steps the interprofessional team could take if the change is unsuccessful. Make sure to include slide notes of 100-250 words for each slide.

You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.


 ge(0.00%)Satisfact(88.00%)(100.00 Ear
   ory) %) ne
   (80.00%    d
ng Change0%
with an 
d of the%descriptiondescriptiondescriptiondescriptioncompreh
Situation, on of theon of theon of theon of theensive
Including backgrobackgrobackgrobackgrodescription
the und ofund ofund ofund ofon of the
Rationale thethethethebackgro
for situationsituationsituationsituationund of
Change ,,,,the
and the includingincludingincludingincludingsituation
Goal or thethethethe,
Goals of rationalerationalerationalerationaleincluding
Change forforforforthe
  and theand theand goaland thefor
  goal orgoal oror thegoal orchange
  goals ofgoals ofgoals ofgoals ofand the
  change,change,change,change,goal or
  is notisisis clearlygoals of
  .but it and wellis
   lacks developthorough
   detail or
   is  develop
   incomplete.  ed with supporting details.   
and on of theon of theon of theon of theensive
External keykeykeykeydiscussi
Interprofes internalinternalinternalinternalon of the
sional andandandandkey
Stakeholder externalexternalexternalexternalinternal
ers That interprofinterprofinterprofinterprofand
Should Be essionalessionalessionalessionalexternal
Involved in stakeholstakeholstakeholstakeholinterprof
Change ders thatders thatders thatders thatessional
Efforts shouldshouldshouldshouldstakehol
  bebebebeders that
efforts isefforts isefforts isefforts isin
includedbut it providedefforts is
.lacks and wellthorough
 detail or developly
 is ed.develop
 incompl  ed with
 ete.  supporti
e Change%discussidiscussidiscussidiscussicompreh
Theory or on of anon of anon of anon of anensive
Model appropriappropriappropriappropridiscussi
That Could ateateateateon of an
Be Used changechangechangechangeappropri
to Achieve theory ortheory ortheory ortheory orate
Results modelmodelmodelmodelchange
  thatthatthatthattheory or
  could becould becould becould bemodel
  used toused toused toused tothat   
achieveachieveachieveachievecould be
results isresults isresults isresults isused to
includedbut it providedresults is
.lacks and wellthorough
 detail or developly
 is ed.develop
 incompl  ed with
 ete.  supporti
Outline for10.0AnAnAnAnA   
Change forforforforensive
  is notisisis clearlyinitiating
  .but it and wellis
   lacks  thorough
   detail or isincomplete. developed with supporting details.   
Impact to5.0%AAAAA   
the discussidiscussidiscussidiscussicompreh
Organizati on of theon of theon of theon of theensive
on if the impactimpactimpactimpactdiscussi
Change to theto theto theto theon of the
Initiative Is organizaorganizaorganizaorganizaimpact
Unsuccess tion iftion iftion iftion ifto the
ful Again thethethetheorganiza
and changechangechangechangetion if
Potential initiativeinitiativeinitiativeinitiativethe
Steps the isisisischange
Interprofes unsuccessunsuccessunsuccessunsuccessinitiative
sional ssfulssfulssfulssfulis
Team againagainagainagainunsuccess
Could potentialpotentialpotentialpotentialagain   
 take istake istake istake isteam
 includedbut it providedtake is
 .lacks and wellthorough
 Presentdetail or developly
 ation:is ed.develop
 Identifyincompl  ed with
 ngete.  supporti
 interprof   ng
 essional   details.
Sources are notofofofof
   is onlyis met,is met.s is met.
    outdatedbut notand
    inappropsourcesate for
     ate forent
on of%contentcontentpresentacontentcontent
Content lacks ais vaguetionis writtenis written
  clearinslideswith aclearly
  point ofconveyinarelogicaland
  view andg a pointgenerallyprogressconcisel
  logicalof viewyion ofy. Ideas
  e ofdoes notnt, butandlly
  informaticreate aideassupportiprogress
  Includessense ofshowinformatirelate to
  veprojectency ing a unity,The
  on.sometion or ince, andincludes
  ideas isinformatihips toThequestion
  unclear.on.eachprojects and
     ve information from reliable sources.organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.   
Layout10.0 %The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, heading s, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks ofThe layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting withlarge gaps of white space or a distracting background.Overall readabilityThe layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately.Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold,long paragraphThe layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read.The fonts are easy to read and point size variesThe layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of heading s, subheadings, andwhite space. Text is appropriate in   
  text, small point size for fonts, andinappropriate contrasting colors.Poor use of heading s, subheadings,indentations, or bold formatting is evident.ty is difficult due to lengthyparagraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriateindentations of text.phs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.Presentation Identifying Interprof essional Stakeholdersappropriately for headings and text.length for the target audience and to the point.The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.   
Language Use and AudienceAwareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)10.0 %Inappropriateword choice and lack of varietyin language use is evident. Writer appears to be unaware of the audiencee. Use of primer proseSome distractinginconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present.The writerexhibits somelack of control in using figures ofLanguage is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.The writer is clearly aware of the audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speechThe writeruses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, andword choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropri   
  indicates thewriter either does not apply figures of speech or uses theminappropriately.speech appropriately. to communicate clearly.ate to purpose, discipline, and scope.   
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,5.0%Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impedeFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distractSome mechanical errors or typos are present, but theySlides arelargely free of mechanical errors, althoughWriter is clearly in control of standard, written, academi   
language use) communication of meaning.the reader.are not overly distracting to the reader.a few may be present.c English.   
Documentation ofSources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)5.0%Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources isinconsistent orincorrect , as appropriate to assignment and style,with numerouSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.   
   s formatting errors.      
Total Weightage100%