NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion - Impact Of HITECH On My Organization

NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion – Impact of HITECH on My Organization

Permalink: https://nursingassignmentacers.com/nurs-6051-week-9…-my-organization/ Overall, the impact of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health ACT of 2009 has been very positive at my current facility. The electronic health record …Impact of Incentives and Meaningful Use

As listed above, meaningful use incentives are geared towards meeting the goals of … Article of Successful Meaningful Use

One of the pivotal goals in meaningful use is decrease in medication errors. Nuckols et al. wrote …Week 9 Discussion – Impact Of HITECH On My Organization

NURS 6051 Week 8 Discussion (Walden)

Practice Issue

The practice issue to be discussed in this paper is the use of needleless systems by nurses in the ICU. As a travel nurse across the south, I saw a signiﬁcant disparity in different hospitals ….

Health IT Supporting Evidence-Based Practice

As mentioned in this week’s reading assignment, gone are the days when nurses were dependent on local libraries and monthly journals. With the advent of the internet and the on-…

NURS 6051 Week 10 Discussion (Walden)

RN PHI Responsibility

According to the American Nurses Association (ANA), protecting a patient’s … PHI and Portable Devices

HealthIT.gov recommends NOT using portable storage devices to transport PHI due to the …

My Facility and PHI University Hospital is a Magnet hospital, and it prides itself on using the best evidence-based …

NURS 6051 Week 11 Assignment (Walden) Data/Information/Knowledge/Wisdom Continuum data/Information/Knowledge/Wisdom Continuum

As a registered nurse (RN), working in an intensive critical care unit (ICU) is seen as the zenith of clinical skills and knowledge. Every day, you are continuously faced with critical decisions

Clinical Question

Will obtaining the CCRN certiﬁcate lead to nurses in the ICU obtaining more critical care knowledge that can lead to wisdom in their role as a nurse?

Data and Information

The American Nurses Association (ANA) deﬁne data as “discrete entities that are described

CCRN Search Knowledge on the CCRN

Transforming CCRN knowledge to Critical Care Wisdom. NURS 6051 Weekly Discussions and Assignments

NURS 6051 Week 11 Discussion (Walden)

Health Literacy Responsibility

According to the U. S. Department of Health and Services (HSS), all public health care … Patient Resource to Evaluate Information One of the best online resources for both patients and health care professionals is the … Additional Strategies

According to a 2016 Gallup poll, nurses are once again seen as the most trusted and …

NURS 6051 Week 11 FINAL PAPER (Walden)

A Patient Guide for Clostridium diﬃcile Walden University: Nursing 6051, Section 9 A Patient Guide for Clostridium diﬃcile Clostridium diﬃcile has been found to be the main cause of gastrointestinal-related death …Health Literacy Promotion Among Patients

The attached brochure was created for the sake of increasing health literacy and … Conclusion Since C. diff has the potential to kill or signiﬁcantly disturb the health of patients, it is ...

Rubric Detail

Select Gridview or Listview to change the rubik’s layout.

Content

Name: NURS_5051_Week4_ Application_ Rubric

Grid View List View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Quality of	Points:Points Range: 27	Points:Points	Points:Point	Points:Poi
Work	(27%) – 30 (30%)	Range: 24 (24%) –	s Range: 21	nts Range:
Submitted:	Assignment exceeds	26 (26%)	(21%) – 23	0 (0%) –
The extent of	expectations. All topics	Assignment	(23%)	20 (20%)
which work	are addressed with a	meets	Assignment	Assignment
meets the	minimum of 75%	expectations. All	meets most	t
assigned	containing exceptional	topics are	of the	superﬁciall
criteria and	breadth and depth about	addressed with a	expectation	y meets
work reﬂects	each of the assignment	minimum of 50%	s. One	some of
graduate	topics.	containing good	required	the
level critical	Feedback:	breadth and depth	topic is	expectation
and analytic		about each of the	either not	ns. Two or
thinking.			addressed	more

		assignment topics.Feedback:	or inadequately addressed. Feedback:	required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback:
Quality of	Points:Points Range: 5	Points:Points	Points:Point	Points:Poi
Work	(5%) – 5 (5%)A clear and	Range: 4 (4%) – 4	s Range: 3.5	nts Range:
Submitted:	comprehensive purpose	(4%)Purpose of	(3.5%) – 3.5	0 (0%) – 3
The purpose	statement is provided	the assignment is	(3.5%)Purpose	(3%)No
of the paper	which delineates all	stated, yet is brief	se of the	purpose
is clear.	required criteria.	and not	assignment	statement
	Feedback:	descriptive.	is vague or	was
		Feedback:	off topic.	provided.
			Feedback:	Feedback:

Assimilation	Points:Points Range: 9	Points:Points	Points:Point	Points:Poi
and	(9%) – 10	Range: 8 (8%) – 8	s Range: 7	nts Range:
Synthesis of	(10%)Demonstrates the	(8%)Demonstrate	(7%) – 7	0 (0%) – 6
Ideas:	ability to critically	s a clear	(7%)Shows	(6%)Shows
The extent to	appraise and	understanding of	some	a lack of
which the	intellectually explore key	key concepts.	degree of	understand
work reﬂects	concepts.	Feedback:	understandi	ding of key
the student’s	Feedback:		ng of key	concepts,
ability			concepts.	deviates
to:Understand			Feedback:	from
d and				topics.
interpret the				Feedback:
assignment’s
key
concepts.

Assimilation	Points:Points Range: 18	Points:Points	Points:Point	Points:Poi
and	(18%) – 20	Range: 16 (16%) –	s Range: 14	nts Range:
Synthesis of	(20%)Demonstrates and	17	(14%) – 15	0 (0%) –
Ideas:	applies exceptional	(17%)Integrates	(15%)Minim	13
The extent to	support of major points	speciﬁc	ally includes	(13%)Inclu
which the	and integrates 2 or more	information from	and	des and
work reﬂects	credible outside sources,	1 credible outside	integrates	integrates
the student’s	in addition to 2-3 course	resource and 2-3	speciﬁc	speciﬁc
ability	resources to support	course resources	information	information
to:Apply and	point of view.	to support major	from 2-3	n from 0 to
integrate	Feedback:	points and point	resources to	1 resource
material in		of view.	support	to support
course		Feedback:	major	major
resources			points and	points and
(i.e. video,			point of	point of
required			view.	view.
readings, and			Feedback:	Feedback:
textbook)
and credible
outside
resources.

Assimilation	Points:Points Range: 18	Points:Points	Points:Point	Points:Poi
and	(18%) – 20	Range: 16 (16%) –	s Range: 14	nts Range:
Synthesis of	(20%)Synthesizes and	17	(14%) – 15	0 (0%) –
Ideas:	justiﬁes (defends,	(17%)Summarizes	(15%)Identify	13
The extent to	explains, validates,	information	ies but does	(13%)Rarel
which the	conﬁrms) information	gleaned from	not interpret	y or does
work reﬂects	gleaned from sources to	sources to	or apply	not
the student’s	support major points	support major	concepts,	interpret,
ability to:	presented. Applies	points, but does	and/or	apply, and
Synthesize	meaning to the ﬁeld of	not synthesize.	strategies	synthesize
(combines	advanced nursing	Feedback:	correctly;	concepts,
various	practice.		ideas	and/or
components	Feedback:		unclear	strategies.
or different			and/or	Feedback:
ideas into a			underdevelo
new whole)			ped.
material in			Feedback:
course
resources
(i.e. video,
required
readings,

textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, ﬂow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas.Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neit

Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, ﬂow, continuity and clarityFeedback:

Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, ﬂow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.Feedback:

Points:Point s Range: 3.5(3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, ﬂow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% ofthe time. Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3(3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, ﬂow, continuity and clarity< 60% of the time. Feedback:

her long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation NURS 6051 Week 4 Discussion –	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Feedback:	Points:Point s Range: 3.5(3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4)grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3(3%)Contains many (≥ 5)grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s

Innovative Technology				understanding.Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APAformat errors. Feedback:	Points:Point s Range: 3.5(3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APAformat errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3(3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APAformat errors. Feedback:

citations, and reference list.

Show Descriptions Show Feedback Related Posts:

NURS 6051 Week 11 Discussion – Health Literacy NURS 6051 Week 10 Discussion – RN PHI Responsibility NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workﬂow Process

NURS 6051 Week 7 Discussion – Three Workﬂow Concepts